Carol Balzer v. County of Kern

57 F.3d 1076 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Carol BALZER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF KERN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-17157. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 7, 1995. Before CUMMINGS, * SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiff Carol Balzer is the sole proprietor of Balzer Enterprises which fabricates, welds and paints metal objects. Ms. Balzer brought the present action under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 alleging numerous violations of her constitutional and state law rights by various members of the Kern County Fire department, District Attorney's Office and Board of Supervisors stemming from their attempts to bring Balzer Enterprises into compliance with the local fire code. In two separate orders, the district court granted summary judgment for defendants on all counts. Plaintiff appeals the decision as to five of those counts, but finding the district court's detailed and thorough treatment correct on all…