Mohammed Tawfik Alkhasawneh v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

57 F.3d 1076 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mohammed Tawfik ALKHASAWNEH, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70141. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1995. * Decided June 8, 1995. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, No. Aye-noc-uky. BIA PETITION DENIED. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mohammed Tawfik Alkhasawneh, a native and citizen of Jordan, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision affirming the immigration judge's ("IJ") finding of his deportability based on his entering into a fraudulent marriage. 3 On petition for review, Alkhasawneh contends that the BIA erred by affirming the IJ's decision because substantial evidence did not support the IJ's finding. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review. 4 * Background 5 In May…