National Labor Relations Board v. Refuse Compactor Service, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
57 F.3d 1077 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. REFUSE COMPACTOR SERVICE, INC., Respondent. No. 93-70988 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 9, 1995. * 1 On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board; Nos. 31-CA-18073, 31-CA-18175, 31-CA-18245, 31-CA-18287, 31-CA-18385 and 31-CA-18497. 2 N.L.R.B. 3 ENFORCEMENT GRANTED. 4 Before: HALL and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and LEVI, ** District Judge 5 MEMORANDUM *** 6 The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order entered May 13, 1993 against Refuse Compactor Service, Inc. ("RCS"). We have jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. Sec. 160 (e) and now grant the Board's application for enforcement. 7 In its Decision and Order the Board found that RCS had committed various unfair labor practices in violation of section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (a)(1): 8 [b]y threatening…