Swope

Sargent v. Swope

Good Law
108 F.2d 177·1939 U.S. App. LEXIS 2528
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 1939No. 9263California202 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Denman, J.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to free appellants from imprisonment on conviction of the crimes of manufacturing and passing counterfeit silver coins. Appellants petitioned the district judge for a writ of habeas corpus. The writ was granted, the prisoners brought before the court, and the appellee warden appeared and showed cause for the imprisonment.

The petition for the writ, verified by both petitioners, alleged that the petitioners had pleaded guilty to the charge, after advising the court they needed the assistance of counsel and were denied such counsel, and were advised by the court, “This court does not appoint counsel.”

The burden of proof was on petitioners to establish these facts. Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 468 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 . There is evidence of one of the petitioners flatly contradicting the allegation concerning their request to the court in which they were convicted and the alleged remark of the district judge which, if believed, made liars, if not perjurers, of the petitioners and entitled the court below *178 to reject their testimony as a whole and to hold that their burden of proof had not been maintained. We find no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.