Nancy Kalagian v. Dr. Vicky Carwein University of Nevada

57 F.3d 1077 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nancy KALAGIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Vicky CARWEIN; University of Nevada, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17071. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 11, 1995. Decided May 26, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, POOLE, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Nancy Kalagian sued Dr. Vicky Carwein and the University of Nevada for denial of due process of law in violation of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 , and for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 626 et. seq., and 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Kalagian now appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir. 1994), and we affirm. 3 Kalagian failed to present a genuine issue of material fact as to her alleged…