Kamal M.E. Mubarik v. David Brown, and Richard A. Walsh, Maricopa Medical Center Carlos Benevidez, Tempe Police Department

57 F.3d 1077 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kamal M.E. MUBARIK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David BROWN, Defendant, and Richard A. Walsh, Maricopa Medical Center; Carlos Benevidez, Tempe Police Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16432. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1995. * Decided June 8, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kamal M.E. Mubarik, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Carlos Benevidez, a City of Tempe police officer, the Maricopa County Medical Center ("Medical Center"), Dr. Richard Walsh ("Walsh"), an emergency room physician at the Medical Center, and other medical personnel in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that the defendants treated him with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We review de novo. See Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709 , 712 (9th Cir.1990).…