Pishdad v. Faye

57 F.3d 1077 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Amir PISHDAD; Amir's Professional Diving Service, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael FAYE; New Zealand Challenge Limited; Mercury Bay Boating Club; Bruce Farr; Rod Davis; Peter Blake; Eldon Archer; Matthew Montgomery; Craig Kells, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55284. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 9, 1995. * Decided June 13, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Pishdad appeals pro se from the district court's judgment following a bench trial in favor of New Zealand Challenge, Inc., and its employees. Pishdad alleged that he was assaulted and battered when, while diving, his face mask was removed underwater, and when he was subsequently detained by New Zealand Challenge employees for diving in the vicinity of the New Zealand Challenge yacht, which was to be used in the America's Cup sailing competition. The employees detained Pishdad…