Diane James v. Prudential-Bache Securities Inc.

57 F.3d 1077 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Diane JAMES, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. PRUDENTIAL-BACHE SECURITIES INC.; JERRY P. GETTINGER; Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Joseph Kett; James Trice; Jack Graner, Defendants-Appellees, and Does, Does I Through XXV, Inclusive, Defendants. Nos. 94-55315, 94-55319. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 9, 1995. * Decided June 13, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, POOLE, and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Diane James sued her former employer, Prudential-Bache Securities Incorporated ("Prudential-Bache"), in federal court on November 2, 1988 alleging sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. 1 The district court entered a decision and order on December 26, 1989 dismissing James' Title VII claim because it was not timely filed. 2 On July 8, 1992, James filed a motion to reinstate the Title VII claim. The…