Sean Quinn v. U.S. Navy

57 F.3d 1077 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sean QUINN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. NAVY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-56067. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1995. * Decided June 8, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sean Quinn appeals pro se the district court's dismissal as moot of his action under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"). Quinn also appeals the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 60(b) motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 1 3 Quinn contends that his cause of action is not moot because the United States Navy's ("Navy") response to his FOIA request was inadequate. Specifically, Quinn contends that (1) the copy of the EEG he requested was inadequate, and (2) the Navy failed to provide an accounting of the disclosures of his records. These contentions lack merit. 4 An action to compel the production of documents…