United States v. Keith E. Dolgaard and William E. Miller, United States of America v. William E. Miller and Keith E. Dolgaard

57 F.3d 1078 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith E. DOLGAARD and William E. Miller, Defendants-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William E. MILLER and Keith E. Dolgaard, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 94-10187, 94-10188, 94-10518, 94-10519. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 7, 1995. Before CUMMINGS, * SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Miller, an investment manager for several union pension trust funds, invested a large percentage of the funds he controlled in real estate transactions brokered by Dolgaard. During the same six-year span, Dolgaard, through various corporate identities, made payments to Miller totaling $650,000 of which over $350,000 was never repaid. Miller and Dolgaard were both convicted by a jury of violating 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1954 and related RICO, conspiracy, and forfeiture charges. They raise numerous challenges to their…