United States v. Robert Moffett King

57 F.3d 1078 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Moffett KING, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30064. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 1994. Decided June 13, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, No. CR-93-29-PGH; Paul G. Hatfield, District Judge, Presiding. D.Mont. REVERSED. Before: NOONAN, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 A jury convicted Robert Moffett King of abusive sexual contact pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2244 . He appeals, claiming (1) that the district court erred in failing to dismiss his indictment; (2) that the district court failed to make available exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963); (3) that the district court should have suppressed his confession as coerced; (4) that his conviction was not supported by sufficient evidence; and (5) that the…