Ernest S. Walker v. James A. Anderson Barbara Durham Robert F. Utter Washington State Bar Association Thomas E. Kelley

57 F.3d 1079 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ernest S. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James A. ANDERSON; Barbara Durham; Robert F. Utter; Washington State Bar Association; Thomas E. Kelley, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-36002. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1995. * Decided June 8, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ernest S. Walker appeals pro se from the district court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . In his complaint, he sought declaratory, monetary, and injunctive relief against defendants, justices of the Washington State Supreme Court, members of the Washington State Bar Board of Governors, and members of the Washington State Commission on Judicial Conduct, due to their alleged failure to properly exercise their general supervisory and regulatory powers over the lawyers and judges of the State of Washington. We…