Nos. 93-16110, 93-16649

Good Law
57 F.3d 1079
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 19951079California1,085 words

Opinion

Opinion

57 F.3d 1079 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Antoinette WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, George Hart, and Does 1 through 25, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 93-16110, 93-16649. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 13, 1995. Decided June 14, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Antoinette Walker appeals the district court's dismissal of her Title VII claim against the City of Oakland and George Hart, the Oakland Police Department's ("OPD") Chief of Police, after she presented her case in chief in a bench trial. Walker also appeals the district court's award of costs to the defendants. We have jurisdiction and affirm. 3 * Walker claims that the defendants discriminated against her on the basis of her sex by not promoting her to sergeant. Consideration of her claim requires an understanding of the system OPD employs to determine whom to promote. Police officers who pass…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.