Carpenter, Babson & Fendler v. Condor Pictures, Inc.

Good Law
110 F.2d 317·1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4532
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 11, 1940No. 9329California1,705 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haney, J.

Claims for attorneys’ fees were disallowed by the court below, and the claimants appealed pursuant to § 250 of the Chandler Act, Act of June 22, 1938, 11 U.S.C.A. § 650 .

On November 23, 1937, an involuntary petition for the adjudication of Condor Pictures, Inc., hereafter called the debtor, was filed. The debtor’s directors adopted a resolution employing Carpenter, Babson and Fendler, hereafter called the firm, as attorneys for it at a compensation to be fixed by the court. The firm filed for the debtor an answer to the petition and a motion to dismiss. Certain creditors then filed a petition for reorganization of the debtor, under former § 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207 . The firm on behalf of the debtor then filed an answer consenting to the petition for reorganization. The firm thereafter represented the debtor in the reorganization proceedings until April 15, 1938, when other attorneys were substituted for the firm.

Appellant Fendler had a claim against the debtor, and represented other creditors as well as stockholders holding in excess of ten per cent of the corporate stock. He initiated and formulated the plan of reorganization subsequently adopted,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.