Rasmusson

Rasmusson v. National Popsicle Corp.

Good Law
111 F.2d 453·45 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 470·1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3672
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 30, 1940No. 8992California624 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Denman, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree of the District Court adjudging defendants-appellants guilty of infringement of three patents collectively owned by the plaintiffs-appellees.

The patents in suit are: (1) The Burt process patent No. 1,470,524, as to claims 1, 2 and 5; (2) the Epperson patent No. 1,-505,592, as to claims 2 to 7, inclusive; and (3) the Burt product patent No. 1,718,997, as to claims 1, 3, 5, and 7. Of these, only claim 5 of the Burt process patent No. 1,-470.524 and claims 3 and 5 of the Burt product patent No. 1,718,997, were not involved in the adjudication of invalidity in Icyclair, Inc., v. National Popsicle Corp., 9 Cir., 94 F.2d 669 . The decision of the District Court was rendered prior to our decision in that case.

Claim 5 of Burt process patent No. 1,-470.524 is described as: “The process of making a frozen confection which consists in bringing a handle member in contact with a body of edible substance which is fluid at normal temperatures, subjecting the body to refrigeration whereby it is solidified and thereby attached to the handle by congelation, and applying a protective outer coating of a material which is hard at normal temperatures…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.