Walker

Walker v. Chitty

Good Law
112 F.2d 79·1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4230
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 13, 1940No. 9387California1,626 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garrecht, J.

We have before us for decision an appeal by Clyde H. Walker and Justin B. Sheehy from an order of the court below denying their petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioners were convicted under one indictment, of a violation of Section 338 of 18 U.S.C.A., using the mails to defraud, and under a second indictment, of a violation of Section 88 of 18 U.S.C.A., conspiracy to violate said Section 338. Both were sentenced to serve terms of imprisonment at McNeil Island,Washington, and fines were assessed. The-judgments were entered March 4, 1939, and on the same day a petition for writ of habeas corpus was filed, which -was amended, and the petition filed April 21,, 1939. -

*81 The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus alleged, inter alia, that the trial of the criminal action was unfair; that the right of defendants to compulsory attendance of witnesses was curtailed; that the defendants were not tried on the indictments found by the grand jury in that said indictments were amended or “sealed” by the trial judge; and that the jury was illegally selected.

The criminal eases had been consolidated for trial before the Honorable Edward E. Cushman, the United States District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.