Wenzel & Henoch Const. Co. v. Metropolitan Water Dist.

Good Law
115 F.2d 25·1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 2782
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 15, 1940No. 9091California5,658 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Denman, J.

Wenzel & Henoch Construction Company,' hereinafter called Company, appeal from a judgment of the District Court in favor of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, hereinafter called District, in a suit arising out of appellant’s work in constructing the San Jacinto Tunnel.

As a part of the Colorado River Aqueduct project it was necessary for appellee, the District, to have a tunnel constructed through San Jacinto Mountain in Southern California. Before issuing specifications and calling for bids for the construction of this tunnel, the District had made a geological study and report. Core drilling was done and an exploratory drift was made at the West portal. The information thus gained was used as the basis for a report as to what the probable conditions of work would be. Both the information and the report were made available to bidders with a provision of the contract later considered protecting the District from a claim that the report is its representation of the existing conditions.

The specifications, as advertised, and as later embodied in the contract, called Public Works Contract, contained a clause, § 7, providing that if at any time the Chief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.