Glynn v. Roy Al Boat Management Corp.

Good Law
57 F.3d 1495·95 Daily Journal DAR 8142·1995 A.M.C. 2022·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15143·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4724
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 199593-15546California6,509 words

Opinion

Opinion

57 F.3d 1495 1995 A.M.C. 2022 , 64 USLW 2012 Christopher Gerald GLYNN, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. ROY AL BOAT MANAGEMENT CORP.; Daniel J. Shawhan, in personam; F/V No Problem, O.N. 650399, her engines, equipment, appurtenances, catch, in rem; F/V Full Moon, her engines, equipment, appurtenance, cargo freight and catch, in rem, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. Nos. 93-15546, 93-15681. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 10, 1994. Decided June 21, 1995. Jay Lawrence Friedheim and Joe P. Moss, Friedheim & Moss, Honolulu, HI, for plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee. James E. Ross, James E. Ross & Associates, Houston, TX, for defendants-appellees-cross-appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Hawai'i. Before: FARRIS, BEEZER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. Opinion By Judge RYMER * ; Dissent by Judge RYMER. RYMER, Circuit Judge: 1 These appeals require us to decide who can be an "employer" for purposes of a seaman's suit under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. Sec. 688, the propriety of punitive damages and attorney's fees awarded on a claim for failure to pay maintenance and cure, and whether the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.