Bailey

Bailey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Good Law
115 F.2d 904·47 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 407·1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3024
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 28, 1940No. 9468California2,374 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

This is a suit by the patentee, Lester W. Bailey, for alleged infringement of his patent No. 1,907,473 for an indicating device designed to show “the exact angular position of the rotor blades” of a condenser, such as is used in a radio receiving set. The device is useful in tuning in stations whose dial readings are known. The device described in the patent consists of a dial with two hands, one moving ten times as rapidly as the other, although the patent is not confined to this ratio. The in- • dicator dial corresponds to the face of a watch and the two hands to the hour hand and the minute hand of a watch. Both hands are operated by a single knob turned by hand. The hands are connected with each other by gears so arranged that as the knob is turned both hands are moved in the predetermined ratio. In the device shown in the patent the shorter hand is rigidly connected to the axis upon which the rotor blades of the condenser are mounted. The other hand is attached to a concentric sleeve on the same axis which is operated by a set of meshed gears or other means deriving power from the axis which is turned by the knob so arranged as to multiply the movement of the sleeve over that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.