John R. Stone v. The Travelers Corporation

Good Law
58 F.3d 434·95 Daily Journal DAR 8198·1995 WL 368850·19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1527·68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 301
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 199593-16778California2,423 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

I.

John Stone brought this action against his employer, The Travelers Corporation, alleging that Travelers’ manner of providing for Stone’s early retirement violated the Age Discrimination In Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 , et seq., and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 , et seq. Stone also asserted an age discrimination claim under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Cal. Gov’t Code § 12941, and a state-law breach of contract claim. The district court dismissed the ADEA count for failure to state a claim, and held that the ERISA claim was time-barred. It also held that the California FEHA claim was preempted by ERISA. Finally, the court dismissed the breach of contract claim as moot except for a dispute over interest, regarding which the court granted leave to amend. No amendment was made, and Stone appeals.

We affirm the district court’s judgment with regard to the ADEA claim, although on a somewhat narrower ground than that chosen by the district court. We affirm the dismissal of the California FEHA claim as preempted. Stone has failed on appeal to support his breach of contract claim, and we consider it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.