Yueh-Shaio Yang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
58 F.3d 452·95 Daily Journal DAR 8177·1995 WL 368875·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15331·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4780
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 199593-70899California569 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKAY, J.

Petitioner, Mr. Yang, claims that the Board of Immigration Appeals abused its discretion in refusing to grant him a discretionary waiver under Section 241(a)(1)(H) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1251 (a)(1)(H) (West Supp.1994). Mr. Yang concedes that he is deportable, but argues that the BIA improperly considered impermissible factors in denying the waiver.

The BIA considered several adverse factors in declining to grant the waiver. First, the BIA seems to have considered Mr. Yang’s participation in his wife’s fraudulent entry into the country, including his taking part in sham divorces and remarriages. These activities were clearly inextricably intertwined with Mr. Yang’s own efforts to secure entry into the country and must be considered part of the initial fraud. Thus, the BIA improperly considered these acts as adverse factors.

The BIA also considered as an adverse factor the fact that Mr. Yang has submitted a fraudulent application for citizenship. The BIA apparently viewed this as a separate fraud from the initial series of frauds that allowed Mr. Yang to gain access to the country and become a lawful resident in the first place. However, in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.