Ingraham

Ingraham v. Commissioner

Good Law
119 F.2d 223·27 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 77·1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3679
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 1941No. 9679California2,831 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Denman, J.

Harold Ingraham petitions for a review of a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals holding him liable for a deficiency income tax arising from the inclusion by the Commissioner in his taxable income for the years 1934-1937, inclusive, of the income of a trust created by him in 1924 for the benefit of his then wife and their children, still minors in the tax years in question. In 1926 taxpayer was divorced from his wife by a decree of the Superior Court of Hartford County, State of Connecticut. The *225 ground of the challenged decision of the Board is that Ingraham owed an obligation in the tax years in question to support his divorced wife and his minor children and that the trust income was income to him because used by him through the medium of the trust he created to discharge this obligation.

The entire income of the trust was payable to the wife during her lifetime, with no requirement to use any of it for the support of the children. The custody of the children was awarded to the mother by the decree of divorce and in the tax years in question she did in fact devote a part of the trust income not determinable on this record to the care and support of the children.

The first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.