Texas Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Good Law
120 F.2d 186·8 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 886·1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4608
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 1941No. 9518California3,600 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Denman, J.

Petitioner, owning and operating a fleet of ocean going gasoline and oil tankers, admittedly engaged in interstate and foreign ■commerce, petitions to have set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board (a) ordering petitioner to cease and desist from the unfair labor practice of discouraging the organization of its crew employees from collective bargaining; (b) ordering the payment of back pay to one seaman and the reinstatement with back pay of another, found by the Board to have been discharged because of their activities as representatives of the crew in attempted collective bargaining with their captains; and (c) ordering the posting of cease and desist notices on all its vessels. The Board *187 cross-petitions for a decree enforcing its order.

Concerning the discharge of the two seamen, we consider the proceeding before the Board as conducted with a complete disregard of the body of Congressional safety legislation for the manning, navigation and management of vessels created to protect the lives of the members of the crew. The particular statutes here applicable are later considered, but the titles for the continued enactments for the last 75 years regulating…

Concurrence in Part

Stephens, J.

(specially concurring in part, dissenting in part).

I concur in the denial of enforcement of the National Labor Relations Board’s order so far as it concerns the discharge and hack pay of Bucldess, and base my concurrence generally upon the intemperance of this seaman. However, since I am unable to agree completely with the majority opinion upon this subject I confine my concurrence to ihe result reached.

I believe the order should be enforced as to all other issues and register my dissent as to the conclusions reached by my associates in regard thereto.

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.