Veaux

Veaux v. Southern Oregon Sales, Inc.

Good Law
123 F.2d 455·51 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 405
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 1941No. 9638California1,322 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haney, J.

Appellant sued appellee alleging infringement of his patent by appellee. The court below entered a judgment for appellee adjudicating the patent sued on to be invalid. D.C., 33 F.Supp. 605, 606 .

The type of box which has long been used in the Pacific Northwest for packing apples and pears is a box having two thick ends which do not bulge, two sides, of a thickness which permits slight bulging, a thin top adapted to permit it to bulge in conformity with the contents, and a thin bottom, which bulges somewhat less than the top.

The following excerpt from appellant’s brief'shows the nature of the patent in issue :

Appellant claimed to have conceived the invention in 1925, but did not actually make a box embodying it until 1928. In 1929 appellee began to make wide use of such a box.

Appellant filed an application for a patent on January 22, 1930. On February 10, 1930, one Ridley, assignor of appellee, filed an application for a patent. The disclosures in each application were- substantially identical. Appellant abandoned his first application, and filed another on October 12, 1931. An interference resulted, which proceedings were not terminated until 1935 when appellee abandoned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.