National Labor Relations Board v. Hollywood-Maxwell Co.

Good Law
126 F.2d 815·10 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 473·1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4263
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 1942No. 9731California5,405 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Denman, J.

This is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order issued against respondent pursuant to Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449 , 29 U.S.C. Supp. V, Sec. 151 et seq., 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.

The jurisdiction of this court is based upon Section 10(e) of the Act. Respondent is a California corporation having its principal place of business in Los Angeles, California, where the claimed unfair labor practices occurred. It was engaged in the manufacture and the interstate shipment and sale of brassieres and bust forms. The jurisdictional facts of the interstate commerce into which flows the product of the laborers’ efforts are proved.

We are asked to decree against respondent (a) a general cease and desist order, the Board having found respondent to have successively bribed one William Busick, a general organizer of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union, at all pertinent times one of the unions of the Congress of Industrial Organizations, who organized some of respondent’s workers into a local, No. 236, hereafter called the C. I. O. Union, and also to have urged and aided certain of its employees to create a union…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.