Durfey v. De Nemours Company

Good Law
59 F.3d 121·95 Daily Journal DAR 8842·25 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21272·40 ERC (BNA) 1993·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16233
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 199594-35371California2,460 words

Opinion

Opinion

59 F.3d 121 40 ERC 1993 , 64 USLW 2064 , 25 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,272, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5144 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8842 Pamela DURFEY; Paulene Echo Hawk; Dorothy George, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. E.I. DuPONT DE NEMOURS COMPANY; General Electric Company, a New York corporation; UNC Nuclear Industries Inc., a Delaware corporation; Atlantic Richfield Company, a Delaware corporation; Rockwell International Corporation, a Delaware corporation; Westinghouse Hanford Corporation, a Delaware corporation; Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35371. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 1995. Decided July 5, 1995. Merrill G. Davidoff, Berger & Montague, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiffs-appellants. David M. Bernick, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, IL, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. Before: SKOPIL, FERGUSON, and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: 1 The present case arises out of the events and litigation in Yakima County, Washington, surrounding the Hanford Nuclear Reservation ("Hanford").…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.