National Battery Co. v. Western Molded Products, Inc.

Good Law
132 F.2d 510·56 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 259·1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2632
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 31, 1942No. 10074California861 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Stephens, J.

Appeal by plaintiffs after judgment in the District Court for defendant dismissing the action.

Appellant is the assignee of letters-patent upon the combination of a moulded battery container and a plaque trade-name plate. The housing for batteries formerly in common use in automobiles was an ordinary wooden box, and the battery manufacturer’s name-plate was tacked or pasted upon *511 it. This housing method gave way to a moulded composition or hard rubber box, with the trade-name moulded integrally.

The battery trade is supplied by companies, who manufacture and market batteries under nationally advertised trade-names, and by wholesale distributors, who buy batteries made up and sell them under their own trade-names. The manufacturers, who sell to such wholesale distributors, supply several or many such distributors. The “blown in the bottle” idea became a material sales advantage and resulted in an economic handicap to the manufacturers for wholesale distributors, and by reflection, to the distributors themselves, because instead of one stock of boxes, a separate stock had to be kept on hand for each distributor supplied.

Young, the patentee, proposed that all boxes be moulded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.