Matcovich

Matcovich v. Nickell

Good Law
134 F.2d 837·30 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1208·30 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1208·1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3699
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 30, 1943No. 10191California540 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

The appellant filed suit in the district court to enjoin collection by the appellee of assessments levied under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, 53 Stat., Part 1, p. 183, § 1600, I.R.C., 26 U.S.C.A.Int.Rev. Code, § 1600, and the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, 53 Stat., Part 1, p. 175, § 1400, I.R.C., 26 U.S.C.A.Int.Rev.Code, § 1400, upon the ground that persons occupied about premises conducted by appellant, whose status fixed liability under the above statutes, were not employees of appellant, and that, therefore, the taxes were not applicable. The appellee moved to dismiss upon the ground that “no suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court.” Section 3653, I.R.C., 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 3653, 53 Stat., Part 1, p. 446. The motion to dismiss was granted, and judgment entered accordingly, from which the appeal is taken.

Matcovich based his bill for injunctive relief upon two grounds:

(1) Inapplicability of the tax. He alleged that the persons by whose presence and occupation the tax attached were not employees, but licensees, and that he was not their employer and, hence, not liable for the tax.

(2)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.