Fee

United States v. Fee

Good Law
138 F.2d 158·1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2443
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 1943No. 10567California510 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

The United States of America, through its solicitors and attorneys, has petitioned this Court for leave to file with it, and such leave has been granted, a petition for a writ of mandamus directed to the Honorable James Alger Fee, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, and that a rule be entered and issued directing that the said Judge show cause why the writ of mandamus should not issue against him in accordance with the prayer of the petition, which is as follows: “Wherefore, your petitioner prays that this Court issue a Writ of Mandamus compelling the Honorable James Alger Fee, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, to enter a final judgment in condemnation determining just compensation in the amounts agreed to by the parties and confirming the Government’s right to the exclusive use of Parcels A and B for the term specified in the petition in condemnation and the declaration of taking.”

The petition reveals allegations of facts to the effect that during the trial of an action in eminent domain before the said Honorable James Alger Fee, of the said United States District Court, said action being entitled United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.