Fred J. Cuthill Rosemarie A. Cuthill, and William J. Pierson Sandra Pierson Samuel C. Roberson v. Multiple Graphics Enterprises, Inc.

59 F.3d 174 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Fred J. CUTHILL; Rosemarie A. Cuthill, Plaintiffs, and William J. Pierson; Sandra Pierson; Samuel C. Roberson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MULTIPLE GRAPHICS ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-55146. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 7, 1995. Remanded to District Court June 9, 1995. Resubmitted June 23, 1995. Decided June 28, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Appellants appeal from the district court's summary judgment. The court concluded that the statute of limitations had run on their claims, and that tolling was inapplicable. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 2 We review a summary judgment de novo. Our task on appeal is to determine whether a genuine issue of material fact exists when the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party,…