Eileen A. Cronyn v. Cigna Employee Benefits, Health Plan Corporation, and Does 1 Through 10, Inclusive

59 F.3d 174 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eileen A. CRONYN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CIGNA EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, Health Plan Corporation, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56583. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 3, 1995. Decided June 19, 1995. Before: McKay, * REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ms. Cronyn appeals the decision of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants in her sexual harassment and discrimination suit. The district court, without ruling on the merits, found that the suit was barred by the one-year statue of limitation set forth in California Government Code Sec. 12960. This provision requires that an aggrieved employee file an administrative charge within one year from the date of the last act of discrimination, or "unlawful practice." It is not disputed that this provision is controlling and that the one-year…