Antonio Andrade-Maravilla v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

59 F.3d 174 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Antonio ANDRADE-MARAVILLA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70128. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1995. * Decided June 12, 1995. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, INS No. Arn-wic-rip. BIA PETITION DENIED. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Antonio Andrade-Maravilla, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") decision dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge's ("IJ") denial of his application for discretionary relief from deportation under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (c). 3 In his petition to this court, Andrade-Maravilla contends that the BIA abused its discretion by failing to properly consider the favorable equities presented by him in his section…