1120 Cent. Condominiums Owners Ass'n v. City of Seal Beach

Good Law
59 F.3d 174·1995 WL 370330·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23520
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 199594-55435California2,680 words

Opinion

Opinion

59 F.3d 174 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 1120 CENTRAL CONDOMINIUMS OWNERS ASSOCIATION; Michelle A. Brendel; Bruce M. Stark, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SEAL BEACH; Edna Wilson; Gwen Forsythe; Frank Laszlo; Marilyn Hastings; William Doane; George Brown; Jerry Bankston; Lee Whittenberg; Barry Curtis; Michael Cho; Don Cox, dba Cox Construction Co., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55435. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1995. * Decided June 21, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, POOLE, and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Bruce Stark, Michelle Brendel, and the 1120 Central Condominiums Owners Association (collectively "Stark") appeal the district court's summary judgment for the City of Seal Beach and other defendants (collectively "City"), and contractor Donald Cox, on Stark's Secs. 1983, 1985(3) and 1986 claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo the district court's summary judgment,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.