Armando Cruz Busmente v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

59 F.3d 174 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Armando Cruz BUSMENTE, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70999. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 14, 1995. Decided June 21, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Armando Cruz Busmente appeals from the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") determination that he is deportable and the BIA's denials of his applications for a suspension of deportation and adjustment of status, and his motion for a continuance. We affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 3 Busmente, a native and citizen of the Philippines, was admitted to the United States as a non-immigrant treaty investor in December of 1984, with authorization to remain until December 12, 1985. A week before his scheduled departure date, Busmente requested an extension of his stay. The Immigration and Naturalization Services ("INS") denied his request…