Fechter v. Shiroky

59 F.3d 175 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Victoria FECHTER; Thor Fechter; Tordis Fechter, Harry R. Fechter, Harry Fechter Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jana SHIROKY, Defendant, and Diane S. Goebel; Bonnie Supin; Marcie Cherik; Dawn Hardy; State of Nevada; Dan Bixler; Fred Fisher; David Dunn; Cheryl Levin; Laurel Swetnam; Jerry Carlin; et.al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16047. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 12, 1995. * Decided June 23, 1995. Before: HUG, ALARCON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Thor Fechter and his parents, Tordis and Harry Fechter, appeal pro se on behalf of Thor's minor child, Victoria Fechter, from the district court's dismissal of their complaint brought on Victoria's behalf under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . The Fechters named twenty-six defendants, various judges, social workers, doctors, lawyers, and state officials, in their complaint alleging a conspiracy to deprive the Fechters of their…