Pacita Imana Hilacion v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

59 F.3d 175 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Pacita Imana HILACION, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70982. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 15, 1995. * Decided June 19, 1995. Petition to Review a Decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service; No. Alq-vsm-zmd. I.N.S. REVIEW DENIED. Before: HUG, ALARCON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Pacita Imana Hilacion ("Petitioner"), a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"), finding her deportable as a result of a fraudulent marriage, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1186a(b), and denying her applications for hardship waiver pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1186 (c)(4)(6), and for voluntary departure. 3 Petitioner contends 1) the Immigration Judge ("IJ") lacked jurisdiction because the Order to Show Cause ("OSC") was defective as a result of being issued prior to the District…