Adebola Olasupo Oshuporu v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

59 F.3d 175 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Adebola Olasupo OSHUPORU, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70658. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1995. * Decided June 12, 1995. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, INS No. Azo-dsq-ttk. BIA PETITION DENIED. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Adebola Olasupo Oshuporu, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision (1) affirming the immigration judge's ("IJ") denial of Oshuporu's application for adjustment of status under section 245(e)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1255 (e)(3), and (2) denying Oshuporu's motion to remand. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105 (a), and we deny the petition. 3 Under the Immigration Marriage Fraud Amendments of 1986, Pub.L. No. 99-639,…