Hiltz v. Russell

59 F.3d 175 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sherry Lynn HILTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Leland E. RUSSELL, In both his individual and official capacities; Carol Rodriquez, In both her individual and official capacities; Miracosta Community College, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55795. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1994. Decided June 22, 1995. Before: GIBSON, * HUG, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sherry Lynn Hiltz appeals the district court's dismissal on res judicata grounds of her gender and physical disability discrimination action against her former employer Mira Costa Community College District and other individuals (collectively "the District"). Hiltz alleged that she was harassed during her employment, denied a promotion, and terminated in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e to 2000e-17 (1988) ("Title VII"), the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,…