Fritz of Hawaii, Inc. v. Pacific Elec. Contractors Ass'n
Opinion
Opinion
59 F.3d 175 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FRITZ OF HAWAII, INC.; Electricians, Inc.; TW Electrical Services, Inc.; Progressive Electric Co., Inc.; Electricians Hawaii, Inc.; John Gushiken Electric, Inc.; A-1 A-Lectrician, Inc.; Mid-Pac Electric, Incorporated; Hygade Electric, Inc.; WASA Electrical Services, Inc.; American Electric Co., Ltd.; Howard T. Kakikawa and Mauna KEA Electric, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PACIFIC ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-17254. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Submitted May 4, 1995. * Decided June 28, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, KOZINSKI and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Section 2.18(a)(1) of the 1980 Inside Agreement unambiguously provides that contributions to the Ad Office Security Fund were to be used "solely for the purpose of paying up to two weeks of employee's [sic] wages and two months of contributions to the PECA-IBEW trust funds." Section 2.18 of the 1985…