Homestead Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Cornish & Carey Residential, Inc., a California Corporation Tom Campagna, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Amicus, Amicus. Cornish & Carey Residential, Inc., a California Corporation Tom Campagna v. Homestead Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Amicus, Amicus

59 F.3d 175 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. HOMESTEAD INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CORNISH & CAREY RESIDENTIAL, INC., a California corporation; Tom Campagna, Defendants-Appellants. Twin City Fire Insurance Company, amicus, Amicus. CORNISH & CAREY RESIDENTIAL, INC., a California corporation; Tom Campagna, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOMESTEAD INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Twin City Fire Insurance Company, amicus, Amicus. Nos. 93-16461, 93-17122. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 16, 1995. Decided June 23, 1995. Before: HUG, FARRIS, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 We affirm for the reasons expressed by the district court. Farris, Circuit Judge, concurring: 3 I agree that the district court's legal analysis is satisfactory. It properly relied on Zieman Mfg. Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 724 F.2d 1343, 1346 (9th…