Ingram v. Riveland
Opinion
Opinion
59 F.3d 175 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul Ross INGRAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Chase RIVELAND, Secretary and Chief Executive Officer, Washington State Department of Corrections; Robert Warden Snyder, Superintendent of the Delaware State Penitentiary, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35627. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 5, 1995. Decided June 26, 1995. Before: BROWNING, WRIGHT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Paul Ingram appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the state on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 motion for a writ of habeas corpus. Because he voluntarily pleaded guilty, we affirm. 3 In November 1988, Ingram confessed to raping his daughters. He pleaded guilty in May 1989 to reduced charges of six counts of third degree rape in state court. In October 1989, with new counsel, he moved to withdraw his guilty plea. After an extended hearing, the court denied the…