Sanjay Kohli v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

59 F.3d 175 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sanjay KOHLI, Petitioner, v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Respondent. No. 93-70990. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1995. * Decided June 12, 1995. Petition for Review of an Order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC No. CRAA-93-02. CFTC PETITION DENIED. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Kohli petitions us to set aside the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) summary affirmance of the National Futures Association's (NFA) decision denying his application for registration as an "associated person" (AP) with Strauss & Company, Inc., an introducing broker engaged in soliciting and accepting orders for the purchase or sale of commodity futures. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 7 U.S.C. Secs. 9 , 21(o)(4). We deny Kohli's petition. 2 Section 8a(2)(C)(ii) of the Commodity Exchange Act (Act) provides that if…