No. 93-17283

59 F.3d 175 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re HERITAGE HOTEL PARTNERSHIP I, A Limited Partnership, Debtor. HERITAGE HOTEL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, a Nevada Partnership; National Heritage Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation; Daniel Keiserman, Appellants, v. VALLEY BANK OF NEVADA, a Nevada corporation; Key Bank, a foreign corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, Appellees. No. 93-17283. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 13, 1995. * Decided June 20, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Heritage Hotel's lender liability claims against Valley Bank are barred under the doctrine of claim preclusion 1 if: (1) Heritage Hotel could have raised the claims in a prior proceeding in which (2) a court of competent jurisdiction rendered a final judgement on the merits, (3) involving the same parties or their privies, and (4) involving the same cause of action. International Union v. Karr, 994…