United States v. Douglas David Hock

59 F.3d 176 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas David HOCK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10301. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 15, 1995. Decided June 26, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, BEEZER and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Douglas Hock appeals his convictions and sentence under the guidelines for two counts of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine ( 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1)) and one count of carrying a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking offense ( 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c)(1)). Hock argues (1) that the district court erred in refusing to accept the sentence recommended in a plea agreement, (2) that the provisions of the United States Sentencing Guidelines applicable to his drug offenses are invalid because they conflict with federal statute, and (3) that the district court erroneously imposed consecutive terms of supervised release. 3…