Raymond Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corporation Ct Corporation System J. Rixon Christopher Reid

59 F.3d 176 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Raymond SIMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEAR ASTRONICS CORPORATION; CT Corporation System; J. Rixon; Christopher Reid; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55135. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 16, 1994. Decided June 23, 1995. Before: FEINBERG, * SCHROEDER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This case arises out of plaintiff-appellant Raymond Simpson's employment by Lear Astronics Corporation, defendant-appellee. He appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Lear, and further argues the district court erred in its earlier dismissal of a number of his claims. His action alleged racial discrimination and retaliation for whistleblower activities. The complaint alleged claims under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1981 ; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e-1, et seq.; the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Cal.…