United States v. D.J.G., Juvenile Male

Good Law
59 F.3d 176·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23090
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 199594-30305California997 words

Opinion

Opinion

59 F.3d 176 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.J.G., Juvenile Male, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30305. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1995. * Decided June 12, 1995. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 D.J.G. appeals his adjudication of juvenile delinquency for second degree murder. D.J.G. contends there was insufficient evidence to establish his participation in the killing and his intent to kill. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 We determine whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Roston, 986 F.2d 1287, 1289 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 206 (1993). Second degree murder requires the trier of fact to conclude that the defendant killed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.