Ralph Renna v. Allstate Insurance Company, Does 1-20

Good Law
59 F.3d 176·1995 WL 370353·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23078
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 199593-17301California1,661 words

Opinion

Opinion

59 F.3d 176 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ralph RENNA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, DOES 1-20, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-17301. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 13, 1995. Decided June 21, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, BEEZER and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Ralph Renna appeals the district court's summary judgment for Allstate Insurance Company in Renna's diversity action for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and negligence, arising out of a dispute over coverage for costs of earthquake repairs to Renna's home. We affirm. FACTS 3 Renna's home, located in Saratoga, California, was damaged October 17, 1989 by an earthquake. He submitted a claim under his homeowner's insurance policy to Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate). Under the terms of the policy, he was entitled to the actual cash value of the loss up to the policy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.