United States of America v. Victor Carrafa

Good Law
59 F.3d 176·1995 WL 378685·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23073
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 199594-10322California2,035 words

Opinion

Opinion

59 F.3d 176 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Victor CARRAFA, Defendant - Appellant. No. 94-10322. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 14, 1995. Decided June 26, 1995. Before: GIBSON, * HUG, and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Victor Carrafa appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1) (1988). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and we AFFIRM. I. BACKGROUND 3 At around 3:00 PM, December 16, 1992, the Sacramento Sheriff's Department executed a search warrant for the person, residence, and vehicle of Michelle Burgess. Burgess' residence is located in a mixed business/residential area. The plain-clothes officers seized considerable evidence of methamphetamine manufacturing, including chemicals and equipment used in the manufacture of illegal methamphetamine as well as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.