Marcial C. Reyes v. Peter Becker Cathy Becker and Marcus X. Burns

59 F.3d 176 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Marcial C. REYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter BECKER; Cathy Becker; and Marcus X. Burns, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15341. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 14, 1995. * Decided June 23, 1995. Before: HUG, ALARCON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Marcial C. Reyes appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for the defendants and the denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. I. 3 Reyes' first contention on appeal is that the district court erred in granting summary judgment on the ground that he failed to establish that he was an employee of the Beckers for purposes of tax withholding. We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir. 1994). We must determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Reyes,…