United States v. David Strauch
Opinion
Opinion
59 F.3d 177 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David STRAUCH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10195. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 10, 1995. * Decided June 23, 1995. Before: CHOY, POOLE and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Strauch challenges his conviction after a jury trial of two counts of bankruptcy fraud. We affirm. 1 18 U.S.C. Sec. 152 provides: 3 Whoever knowingly and fraudulently conceals from the custodian, trustee, marshal, or other officer of the court charged with the control or custody of property, or from creditors in any case under title 11, any property belonging to the estate of a debtor; or 4 Whoever knowingly and fraudulently makes a false oath or account in or in relation to any case under title 11; 5 * * * 6 Shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. 7 Count One of the superseding indictment alleged that, between…